For instance, headshots were eliminated as something that killed you because, and I quote loosely, "the concept of 'boom. Some of them evidently have a warped sense of reality or of how to accomplish "gameplay" (which is one of the main focus of PR, reality often comes second if at all). However, aside from the BF2 engine limitations that it has to cope with, I'm also very disappointed with some of the developper decisions. PR has been a great game, and the community is extremely tactically minded for the most part. My clan has pretty much moved over to this, and when I get some money to buy a new computer, I'll get Arma 2 as well. One of the reason I'm looking into Arma2 is because of Project Reality in many senses. Sorry to go all necro and bump an old thread, but I'd rather do so than make a new one :)  It just depends who you play online with.  I understand what Opteryx means, but to be honest I’ve had similar experiences with BF2 and BF2142 as with ArmA.
So purely on those points ArmA wins everytime for me.Īs for MP gameplay. ArmA doesn't allow the annoying bunny hopping BS ArmA Addons tend to be more accurate (higher poly count allowance?) Game engine allows for a wider array of vehicles ArmA has a less restricted environment ie not a tiny playable area I would say the only differences between ArmA and BF2 are:  My own attempt to help the PR team resulted in abuse, which is pretty much the same as some people the ArmA community so there really isn’t much difference there if Messiah is crying of over the WMIKS, I’m suicidal over the Harrier and Merlin etc. I think its more accurate to say that they hate the way people play BF2, not that they hate the game.Īs for Project Reality itself, the models aren’t exactly accurate. Its funny how everyone hates bf2, but have a copy somehow. The least you should do is post a link in the 1st post.
0 kommentar(er)
